Kevin Pottie (NPI), Claire Kendall, Gary Bloch, Vivian Welch, Vicky Stergiopoulos, Ann Anderman, Peter Tugwell and colleagues received funding from the Inner City Health Associates in 2017 to develop Canadian evidence based guidelines to improve health of homeless and vulnerably housed persons.
Homeless Guidelines News: Volume 1, Issue 1, April 2018
Le point sur les lignes directrices concernant les sans-abri: Volume 1, numéro 1, avril 2018
May 15, 2018: The experiences of homeless and vulnerably housed persons around health and social services. A protocol for a systematic review of qualitative studies. PDF
Campbell protocol (in progress), (Pottie et al 2017) Effectiveness and cost effectiveness or housing, income, mental health and care coordination interventions to improve health of homeless and vulnerably housed persons.
July 31, 2018: Harm reduction and pharmacotherapeutic interventions for persons with substance use disorders: A protocol for a systematic review of reviews. PDF
August 10, 2018: Impact of Interventions for Homeless Youth: A Narrative Review using Health, Social, Gender, and Equity Outcomes. PDF
Funding proprosal - Abstract
Persons living without privacy, security and shelter are at high risk for a number of mental and physical health problems. The life expectancy of men living on the street is 42-52 years of age. Our research began with over 160 collaborators from across Canada, including 76 persons with lived homeless experience. This stakeholder group has identified the health condition most in need of guidelines. The preliminary priority issues include finding a house, income support, care with mental illness and addictions, as well as care coordination interventions. Homeless and vulnerably housed persons exist across Canada, in big and small cities. Our network also identified populations in need of additional research; including the First Nations, Metis and Inuit, youth, women, persons suffering from head injury or intellectual disability and refugees. Our evidence-based working groups includes researchers, practitioners as well as community scholars with lived experience. The next steps will include systematic reviews of interventions for effectiveness and cost effectiveness and GRADE evaluation of the evidence. Community scholars will play an important role throughout the process ensuring relevance and acceptability.
Objective 1 Conduct Delphi consensus processes to prioritize evidence gaps
Objective 2 Conduct systematic reviews with equity considerations on identified priorities and related interventions for the health of people who are homeless and vulnerably housed
Objective 3 Produce GRADE evidence based recommendations for the health of homeless and vulnerably housed people consideration acceptability, feasibility and local contexts.
If you would like to leave a comment, please click here. Remember to leave your name and contact information.